3 ms·
I’ve used it heavily with 99% success. Not to defend Cnet, but: isn't the important statistic the false positive rate? In other words, "recognizing me 99% of
by DrScump 9y ago
I’ve used it heavily with 99% success.
Not to defend Cnet, but: isn't the important statistic the false positive rate?
In other words, "recognizing me 99% of the time" isn't nearly as important as "recognizing when it's not me 100% of the time"... and there are already known spoofs out in the wild where it won't successfully recognized unauthorized access attempts.
- dragonwriter 9y agoFalse negative is important to usability, false positive is important to security; both are important.