5 ms·
Lol. Although many good and seemingly well-reasoned arguments, the author forgot that you can only place a value on something if it is traded for something else
by cmroanirgo 9y ago
Lol. Although many good and seemingly well-reasoned arguments, the author forgot that you can only place a value on something if it is traded for something else. (eg BTC to USD, or chickens to potatoes). It is the ratio that gives the value and also depends on what side of the trade you're on.
"A sudden random jolt downward in bitcoin price prompts many people to try to sell it and worsen the situation,"
This sentence makes no sense because the "bitcoin price" is actually the BTC/USD ratio. You can trade in other ways.
My final, roll-on-the-floor-laughing moment was the description of dollar as a measure of utility:
"If the utility measured by a single dollar fluctuated a lot, that would mean that the number in your bank account would suddenly miscount the utility of all the work that filled it"
This happens every single day. Every government and bank in the world devalues your current bank account (aka inflation), so that you have to work harder (ie, increase your utility) to receive the same benefit.
"If you’re not willing to have a fluctuating bank account, BTC does not make transactions easier. It forces you to make more transactions."
That's precisely why government provided currencies are also worthless! All of us are running around like chickens without their head, hoping to get 'more money' just to survive! Currency is enslavement IMHO.
- ypeterholmes 9y agoWell said. I was also struck by the author's core argument- that Bitcoin will never be stable because nobody can manipulate its value. Seems to me the opposite is true; the fact that nobody can directly manipulate supply will provide the type of stability our current fiat currency sorely lacks.
- xapata 9y agoDid you forget the discussion of Bretton Woods? When you can't alter supply, it might be temporarily stable, but you have catastrophic shocks. Calm before the storm, and all that.
- faint_coder 9y agoCurrency is enslavement? Strange, because I thought you could exchange it for good and services slaves didn't have. Nowadays with a standard household purchasing power you can buy a lot of good and services. Let's back in time, to see what really being slaves would have mean in the past.