3 ms·
What, serious about wanting to know why it is in their codebase? Yes, I'm 100% serious. If they're currently using it in production I'd assume there's a good re
by ganonm 9y ago
What, serious about wanting to know why it is in their codebase? Yes, I'm 100% serious. If they're currently using it in production I'd assume there's a good reason for it. Plus, I'm pretty sure the folks over at LinkedIn engineering are definitely serious. In any case I'm very curious as to why (rightly or wrongly) it's in there.
- jeff571 9y agoIt's in their codebase because they catastrophically over engineered it. Even the largest codebases on earth don't require FactoryFactoryFactory's.