3 ms·
A future with ARM in server CPUs seems more plausible when Intel doesn't have a manufacturing advantage. Also it is likely that Intel's loss of lead in process
by bhouston 9y ago
A future with ARM in server CPUs seems more plausible when Intel doesn't have a manufacturing advantage.
Also it is likely that Intel's loss of lead in process is one of the reasons that AMD (e.g. Ryzen) is actually competitive again.
- kirillseva 9y agos/ARM/RISK-V, and you have instantly nailed a top 1% upvoted post
- redshirt 9y agoProblem with RISC-V is exactly what makes it strong. The lack of verified software ecosystem will keep it from being main stream for at least a decade(something that until recently has held back the Arm server market, well, that and not having a reasonable server core..fixed with the ThunderX2). The fact that you can add instructions quickly is another problem, well, that and the lack of a standardized verification suite for the ISA so that software devs know that implementations are up to spec when they write code for them. I can definitely see RISC-V accelerators taking off though, driven by a more stable x86/Arm/Power core. To me, that path for RISC-V makes a lot of sense.
- nickik 9y ago> The fact that you can add instructions quickly is another problem, well, that and the lack of a standardized verification suite for the ISA so that software devs know that implementations are up to spec when they write code for them. There is a formal specification of both the ISA and the memory model. There are 2 working groups extending the formal models to the standard extensions. Plus these formal efforts there is also a working group defining a sweet of verification tests that you have to pass in order to be qualified RISC-V. The standard profile defined for Linux that will primary be used in the server space is RV65GC and most processor in this space will probably not have non-standardised extensions. I would expect a server core to have maybe vector and crypto extensions.
- dogma1138 9y agoRyzen is competitive despite being on an inferior process. Ryzen is competitive because AMD stopped playing in the mud and decided to catch up, that said it's sad/scary just how much core seem to be a head of it's time Intel has been riding the same uarch for over a decade.
- philjohn 9y agoThe only problem with Ryzen is that it doesn't clock as high as comparable Intel chips, but then again, it runs cooler and uses less power - both of those are because the process GF are using is targeted at lower power mobile CPU's.
- dogma1138 9y agoIt really doesn’t run cooler nor does it consumes less power at the same performance envelope. Intel calculates the peak max draw TDP AMD uses sustainable average over 2 min. Zen is built on 14nm LLP it’s not a ulv/ulp process.