4 ms·
I cannot phantom a reason to put your health at a risk just to accomplish the ego of someone who should just do his work. I personally find it humilating. Care
by TrinTragula 9y ago
I cannot phantom a reason to put your health at a risk just to accomplish the ego of someone who should just do his work. I personally find it humilating. Care to explain better? Sometimes I'm really curious about how someone can have such a radically different view from me on such simple arguments, and I always love finding the reasoning behind that.
- dEnigma 9y agoJust for your information, and I'm not trying to be mean here: You probably meant "fathom", not "phantom".
- TrinTragula 9y agoThanks, english is not my first language, if that's an excuse. I try!
- Ultimatt 9y agoI can see this argument its not exactly burried. The article states there was no associated health risk. The more general point is a surgeon that openly requires signing your organ, is better than one less well trained surgeon in the world. From a utilitarian pov. Not everyone would necessarily care, like you do. Which is definitely true if you look at the range of responses on here. That this guy did it without consent is what's properly bad, tangibly more than the physical result of his breach of ethics.
- benchaney 9y ago> The article states there was no associated health risk The article says the following > Bramhall's handiwork didn't appear to damage either liver These are not even close to the same thing.