3 ms·
Like sibling comment said, you have it backward. The argument is "more competition -> no need for net neutrality", not "repeal of net neutrality -> more competi
by etskinner 9y ago
Like sibling comment said, you have it backward. The argument is "more competition -> no need for net neutrality", not "repeal of net neutrality -> more competition"
Unfortunately, competition is hard to foster when the barrier for entry is so high as to discourage ISPs to build out wherever their competitions already provide service (which leads to effective monopolies).
- noncoml 9y ago> The argument is "more competition -> no need for net neutrality" Are you sure? Ajit Pai's argument is here: https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/14/16777626/ajit-pai-net-neutrality-speech https://www.theverge.com/2017/12/14/16777626/ajit-pai-net-ne... Also: https://fee.org/articles/goodbye-net-neutrality-hello-competition/ https://fee.org/articles/goodbye-net-neutrality-hello-compet...