>would you agree with me that it's not purposefully written to be obfuscated and indecipherable? Yes, but with one exception. It is possible to obfuscate by omm

>would you agree with me that it's not purposefully written to be obfuscated and indecipherable? Yes, but with one exception. It is possible to obfuscate by ommiting information. Assume there is a flaw in IOTA which is not in tangle-structre itself. One could obfuscate the flaw by writing an honest paper about tangle and refusing to talk about IOTA. From the introduction: "The concrete implementation of the iota protocol is not discussed." I don't say (or think) there is an obfuscation. Just that my feeling was that I got too few information to judge about IOTA (or even tangle) from that paper.