3 ms·
> I only read 2 pages. So you are evaluating the quality of a 28 pages paper by reading only the introduction ? Are you intentionally retarded ?
by le_zonzon 9y ago
> I only read 2 pages.
So you are evaluating the quality of a 28 pages paper by reading only the introduction ?
Are you intentionally retarded ?
- y_u_no_rust 9y agoThe post above is in the same style as the founders of the project (see: https://twitter.com/DavidSonstebo/status/941690537509314560 https://twitter.com/DavidSonstebo/status/941690537509314560 )
- logicallee 9y agoI didn't evaluate the quality of the paper. I only evaluated whether it's intentionally indecipherable. I did glance through some more of the paper, though I did not read it carefully. I didn't find anything that tripped any of my criteria, mentioned beforehand, for whether it's an intentionally indecipherable paper: did you see anything like that? Please note that this is not an endorsement of the paper.