3 ms·
"They've always been clear that the intention was to help people on longer journies, not provide free power." That's right. And I think that most people would
by Reason077 9y ago
"They've always been clear that the intention was to help people on longer journies, not provide free power."
That's right. And I think that most people would agree that if you're frequently "supercharging locally" instead of using your own chargers, then that's against the spirit of the supercharger network.
But this ban isn't directed just at those who are using local superchargers excessively when they have a valid alternative. It's a ban on the use of superchargers by any Tesla vehicle that is operated for any commercial use!
A blanket ban on "any other commercial use" is extremely far reaching:
- Rental car companies can no longer add Tesla vehicles to their fleets, as it will be impractical for renters to drive long distances.
- Taxi companies that sometimes get long-distance fares can no longer consider Tesla vehicles, because they could get stranded far away from their "home base" without access to the supercharger network.
- Businesses and government agencies who operate fleet vehicles will not be able to consider Tesla vehicles, because it will not be practical to drive long distances.
I believe this is a very short-sighted policy. A far better solution would be to simply charge fees to commercial users of the supercharger network. This would prevent excessive supercharger use, while still making long distance travel practical when necessary.