3 ms·
The way I understood you is that all mortgages should have been paid off by the government. So if people keep the houses and their mortgages are paid off by a g
by richardknop 9y ago
The way I understood you is that all mortgages should have been paid off by the government. So if people keep the houses and their mortgages are paid off by a gov bailout that is essentially like giving free houses to half of population while the other half that is renting gets nothing.
That is a huge moral hazard. It is essentially same as giving 300k cheque to a selected part of population based on arbitrary logic. How can that be fair to do that? The only fair way to do it would be to just write a cheque for everybody. So all people get the same handout. Any other way is super discriminatory.
I understand that it's appealing for people with mortgages but you have to see how massively discriminatory and unfair that would be.