> You can't call the poll biased just because the subject it is polling about is complicated. My point is the poll may reveal a preference for the status quo,

> You can't call the poll biased just because the subject it is polling about is complicated. My point is the poll may reveal a preference for the status quo, not for the substance of the policy. Risk aversion is natural of course. But when the status quo gets changed, what you thought was public support for your position may vanish. > You really think your version of this is less biased? Of course not. I attempted to make it equally biased for the anti-NN position. > IIRC other countries have already tried this and observed its effects Yeah... US Rep Ro Khanna (from my district!) had probably the most viral message on this topic: https://twitter.com/RoKhanna/status/923701871092441088/ https://twitter.com/RoKhanna/status/923701871092441088/ But this particular case is terrible for the pro-NN proponents. It turns out people actually LIKE zero-rated services, and the "it crowds out startups" argument doesn't land at all.