Agree with this, but the problem is user demand in competitive markets. > I regard anything that runs javascript as inherently malicious, out to violate my pri

Agree with this, but the problem is user demand in competitive markets. > I regard anything that runs javascript as inherently malicious, out to violate my privacy and drain my battery. Tech people like those on HN may understand the centralizing corporate control that's embedded in the current structure of the internet. Average users a) have zero technical understanding b) mainly use JS-heavy, DRM/surveillance-loaded "big tech" websites c) lack the skills, awareness, and desire to change anything for increased user freedom. There's more reward for positive features than lack of negatives. Unless a compelling case can be made to the minimally-competent user who sees only speed, usability, and immediate real-world social use (I can watch DRM movies, play DRM music, use FB / YT / Google Apps / other "big tech"), any shift seems unlikely. The problem is less technical than social. DRM / surveillance tech crapware is now a social norm, and there's rarely a good time to have a discussion. Most non-technical people just don't know or care.