3 ms·

viewing the web as a lost cause or irredeemable is not the same as saying it has nothing to offer. 'leaving the web' also doesn't seem very pragmatic, at least

• krapp 9y ago
  >viewing the web as a lost cause or irredeemable is not the same as saying it has nothing to offer I disagree - if it has something to offer then it's not a lost cause. A lost cause by definition isn't worth saving, or even engaging with. > 'leaving the web' also doesn't seem very pragmatic, at least until something better is available. The comment I replied to earlier suggested that the only reasonable solution to the web was to fork it or start over, with starting over being preferable. I'm merely suggesting that someone should actually get started on that. Or maybe revive Gopher. I hear that's still around.
  • abiox 9y ago
    people can get started on that, and probably are. but the web exists, and the web is pervasive. it doesn't make any sense to abandon it until a replacement arrives... just as it makes no sense to simply abandon gas engines (and what, walk?) before electric ones are ready to replace them. the real question is whether the New Thing can avoid the problems of it's predecessor.
    • deleted 9y ago
      [deleted]