OK, so I got that wrong with the "certain sites". But still, the fact that the extension was not active unless you mess around in about:config is a crucial fac

OK, so I got that wrong with the "certain sites". But still, the fact that the extension was not active unless you mess around in about:config is a crucial fact, which should not have been omitted in an highly critical article, specially if they use words like "Mozilla, you fucked up bad, and you still haven’t apologised. The study is still active and ongoing". I feel misinformed by that article, to say the less.