4 ms·
If your sensitivity to anonymous criticism is really that severe, I’d suggest building a kind of emotional immune system and just getting on with your life. Cer
by QAPereo 9y ago
If your sensitivity to anonymous criticism is really that severe, I’d suggest building a kind of emotional immune system and just getting on with your life. Certainly that kind of sensitivity to the speech of others shouldn’t inspire you to wade into a cultural crossfire, especially if you’re in such an advantageous position as a Sam Altman.
- ChuckMcM 9y agoI wasn't trying to communicate a sensitivity to anonymous criticism, rather I was trying to communicate that anonymous criticism only contributes heat and no progress to a discussion. And then I tried to tie together how that heat can lead to suppression. I take it from your response that you disagree with that. I would be interested in hearing either how you hoped your original comment would contribute to the discussion or how you think I could have more clearly articulated my issue with it.
- Mithaldu 9y agoBut free speech says that you shouldn't suppress ANY speech no matter what it is, so you shouldn't be trying to suppress QAPereo now.
- ChuckMcM 9y agoAre you saying that I shouldn't ask QAPero questions (suppressing my speech) or are you saying that by asking questions QAPero is being suppressed? How is that supposed to work.
- Mithaldu 9y ago> anonymous criticism only contributes heat and no progress to a discussion Is a direct attempt at suppression. I'm saying you're being hypocritical.