Again, the question is whether or not there can be consent, not whether or not there is a power differential. The existence of a power differential doesn't nece

Again, the question is whether or not there can be consent, not whether or not there is a power differential. The existence of a power differential doesn't necessarily mean there can't be consent. Citizens consent to, for instance, the regulations relating to driving when they get their license that the government (which is superior to the individual) sets. But again, my main point stands. If we are to shut down any discussion of the scenario I gave, which many people would be willing to do, by your own considering this would be shutting down a discussion on whether we can drive on the right side of the road or whether we should shake hands. And then this is predicated on such lack of debate not causing any harm, when it can be argued there is similar harm as what people say gay people experience. Again, please, these are devil's advocate arguments. Not personal views.