4 ms·
We are just arguing over semantics. It’s pure evil and needs to stop. I’m sure the US could intervene, but we’d need far more media coverage to generate outrage
by vondur 9y ago
We are just arguing over semantics. It’s pure evil and needs to stop. I’m sure the US could intervene, but we’d need far more media coverage to generate outrage. Clinton was able to do it in the Balkans, but you’d need to convince the current administration to get a involved.
- Mikeb85 9y agoBabies in incubaters anyone? Not like it hasn't been done before... Outrage is easier to generate than proof.
- vondur 9y agoI also didn’t consider that China would probably not be happy with the US in their backyard.
- tptacek 9y agoI don't know what this even means. Proof of what? Which argument are you making now? That it's all "fake genocide"? Or that these people deserve it because they're "jihadis"?
- Mikeb85 9y agoMy comment is in reference to fake eyewitness testimony of atrocities which was used as justification to invade a country. Google 'babies in incubaters' and it should be clear.
- tptacek 9y agoNone of the results for this search had anything to do with the Rohingya Genocide. Things aren't false just because you want them to be. Every sane person wants these stories to be false. They are not.
- Mikeb85 9y agoIt's a well known event in the lead-up to the original US invasion of Iraq. If you don't get why it's relevant then no point having a discussion.