5 ms·
> Someone installed software on their systems without their knowledge or explicit consent. Auto-updating software has been the norm for a while. This is nothin
by Sylos 9y ago
> Someone installed software on their systems without their knowledge or explicit consent.
Auto-updating software has been the norm for a while. This is nothing new, just because it was put into an extension instead.
- Karunamon 9y agoExcept this wasn’t an auto update - it’s a completely different infrastructure pushing stuff into the browser without affirmative consent or even knowledge. And in true malvertising fashion, this system is both opt-out and turns itself back on sometimes.
- SAI_Peregrinus 9y agoAlso auto-update has a changelog. Users can get an idea of what changed, what the new buttons do, etc. This was unannounced and hidden from users.
- electrograv 9y agoAuto-update doesn't carry the implicit moral right to install anything company behind it wants. Auto-update is a consensual agreement with the user. If you use auto-update to deploy something that a vast majority of your users do not want and did not expect, and intentionally so (refusing to roll back a 'mistake'), then you have broken that agreement or moral code. You cannot use the excuse of "oh well if they don't like it they can uninstall it and use another product" to condone this bait-and-switch behavior. Just because the behavior is legal does not make it moral. This behavior is absolutely immoral and must be condemned.
- ryukafalz 9y ago>refusing to roll back a 'mistake' Did they refuse to roll it back? It's marked as "complete" on my Firefox installation and is no longer present on the Extensions page.