"Communist _regimes_ have killed a a lot of people." And Nazi _regimes_ have killed a lot of people. So you're saying that Nazis are okay, then? "I'm not sure

"Communist _regimes_ have killed a a lot of people." And Nazi _regimes_ have killed a lot of people. So you're saying that Nazis are okay, then? "I'm not sure why the American Indiana genocide is in quotes." Because most of the Indians were killed by diseases, not by deliberate genocide. Most of them died without ever seeing a white person (e.g., the former inhabitants of some of the Missisippian culture cities). There were certainly genocidal incidents, some of which were horrifying, but that's not what caused the large-scale depopulation. In any case, that had little or nothing to do with "capitalism". The colonization of the Americas (and, indeed, much of the world) was primarily driven by mercantilism, not capitalism. I'm trying really hard not to sound condescending here, but do you even know what "capitalism" means? It doesn't just mean "not communism". Besides, my argument had to do with current threats, not things that happened hundred of years ago. That Nazis (the real ones) no longer pose a threat while Communists do was the whole point. Can you name a Nazi regime that is constantly threatening to launch ICBMs at the United States, as North Korea does on a seemingly daily basis?