4 ms·
Let’s be honest: both the original post and this rebuttal are basically long form tweets, not intellectually convincing arguments. They are so vague that you ca
by mattbierner 9y ago
Let’s be honest: both the original post and this rebuttal are basically long form tweets, not intellectually convincing arguments. They are so vague that you can read almost whatever you want into them
- mr_spothawk 9y agoI'll concede the rebuttal is literally a long form tweet.
- dnsco 9y agoSorry to be pedantic, this reply hadn't appeared when I posted my response yet.
- dnsco 9y agoThe rebuttal is literally "long form tweets" ( https://twitter.com/anildash/status/941431220952584196 https://twitter.com/anildash/status/941431220952584196 ). Sam's post is presumably something he edited and had people check over before he posted it. That's not to negate your essential argument, but the two pieces do have different origins.