> Not only that, but it might have exacerbated it: someone with the fear of being perceived bias and losing his job will want as few women in his team as possib

> Not only that, but it might have exacerbated it: someone with the fear of being perceived bias and losing his job will want as few women in his team as possible. How about that possibility? Someone being actively nasty towards women in his team just because they are women will most likely get fired, so that's a self-limiting problem. > He said it multiple days before he got fired. The timeline doesn't add up! What timeline? There's only one timeline: 1) He releases a "manifesto" expressing his opinion 2) Someone reads the manifesto, is disgusted and a controversy ensues 3) Media picks up on the controversy 4) Google is forced into a really shitty position by being asked a bunch of times what they are going to do 5) Damore gets fired 6) Damore goes to "men's rights advocate" Stefan Molyneaux podcast and wears his "Goolag" shirt. He does a bit of media, tweets out some really ambiguous tweets. 7) The world forgets about Damore. So where's the flaw in the timeline?