That is a very reasonable impression. Its hard to say at what level the brain can be broken down into discrete 'events', or whatever you might call them. Anywa

That is a very reasonable impression. Its hard to say at what level the brain can be broken down into discrete 'events', or whatever you might call them. Anyway, I'm not opposed to throwing out the network model. I'm just puzzled by the reluctance to take it seriously, as in serious enough to say "this is how the brain works". I don't know, maybe chalk it up to reluctance to equate the brain with a computer. But the so-called "top down" model seems like equating the brain with a steel mill or something, so I don't know.