3 ms·
It was Starbucks’ wifi provider, selected by Starbucks and operating under Starbucks’ supervision. This is 100% on Starbucks, not on anyone else.
by claudius 9y ago
It was Starbucks’ wifi provider, selected by Starbucks and operating under Starbucks’ supervision. This is 100% on Starbucks, not on anyone else.
- paperpunk 9y agoI do agree that Starbucks share responsibility but would you really say that 0% of the responsibility is with the person or people who actually set up the mining?
- Cthulhu_ 9y agoSo you're saying never to trust 3rd party providers? It's one for the legal team I'd say; in this case Starbucks probably didn't provision for abuse or time spent in the wifi portal in the contracts. Might have a case for causing reputation damage.
- vorotato 9y agoIf it were my business I'd absolutely say that. Doesn't mean you shouldn't USE 3rd party providers but you should be very careful. That's obviously not saying anything about legal responsibilities, of which I know nothing about.