> The argument in this article is that Google touches every part of the internet, and you can't live without their services even if you wanted to, because they'

> The argument in this article is that Google touches every part of the internet, and you can't live without their services even if you wanted to, because they're so widespread. I can accept that, but wouldn't that also mean that Google has an interest in a free and neutral internet, because their services are so widespread? Google has a financial interest in its services being available as widely and quickly as possible. Google has a different kind of interest in other folks services being available and the specific interest depends on who and what services we're talking about.