> it's whether you even acknowledge that what the article presented is fact I do not accept the article as fact. Read the (very few, mostly on pull quote) ref

> it's whether you even acknowledge that what the article presented is fact I do not accept the article as fact. Read the (very few, mostly on pull quote) references. They are cherry-picked stats, or from completely biased sources. Almost everything else in the article is completely un-cited. There are no dissenting viewpoints or statistics presented. It has no merit as a journalistic or academic work.