> What if everyone in the 1960s had a decade to prepare for PCs [...] while they were still prototypes? In hindsight, we can all see that jumping in early would

> What if everyone in the 1960s had a decade to prepare for PCs [...] while they were still prototypes? In hindsight, we can all see that jumping in early would have been the right call. This is an interesting hypothetical based on the assumption that quantum computers will be available in 10 years time. What if the first practical quantum computers are still 50 years away? Using the same hypothetical, it would be like someone preparing for the PC age in that 1920s. That might be "jumping in" too early.