>Most of those studies were debunked as using very shaky methodologies. Just because you can quote a paper it doesn't mean the paper is right. I'd love a sourc

>Most of those studies were debunked as using very shaky methodologies. Just because you can quote a paper it doesn't mean the paper is right. I'd love a source on that, because as far as I remember most of the stuff he referenced wasn't very controversial. E.g. one of his biggest points was that men and women have statistically different five factor personality distributions. >Probably, but objective observable truth should prevail. Sure. The problem is I strongly disagree with you about what the "objective observable truth" is.