3 ms·
The appellees tried to use the 10th and the Court said no and then further said the 10th is basically a legal truism. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-cou
by CalChris 9y ago
The appellees tried to use the 10th and the Court said no and then further said the 10th is basically a legal truism.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/282/716.html http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/282/716.html
- munk-a 9y agoSorry, by "legal truism" you mean inherently enforceable because it is reinforcing a point that is taken to be true without any sort of countermand? Your statement seems self-contradictory.