3 ms·
I agree with your premise. I'm just reaching a different conclusion. As a permission issue, the bot _may_ have been authorized and authenticated, however the
by IncRnd 9y ago
I agree with your premise. I'm just reaching a different conclusion.
As a permission issue, the bot _may_ have been authorized and authenticated, however the company was sent a C&D letter that revoked all authorizations. That is why I say that logging in and accessing the resources did not constitute authorizations.
If a C&D letter would not have been sent, I think I'd agree with you.
- jimktrains2 9y agoYou can't prevent me from looking in your window though, at a sign you put up for people to look at none-the-less, with a C&D.
- IncRnd 9y agoAgreed. That's why I made my earlier comment, that this is closer to your entering a store (not just looking in the window) and examininb the merchandise after you already had been sent away for trespassing, revoking all authorization.