5 ms·
Notice that I chose the phrase "reign in the debate". And I would say that the FCC has sufficient "skin in the game". Google/Verizon, to their credit, have put
by plnewman 16y ago
Notice that I chose the phrase "reign in the debate". And I would say that the FCC has sufficient "skin in the game".
Google/Verizon, to their credit, have put out at least some of their proposal for public consumption. I just don't see how a policy put forward by a corporate entity (or alliance in this case) could be anything but biased to that entity.
- sp332 16y agoJust because it benefits them doesn't mean it's going to hurt me. Google + Verizon employ over a quarter million people (not even counting other shareholders and customers). Any internet policy that benefits them will probably benefit me.