> I am fairly sure the UX is better than Gimp - the often criticised Gimp! Although Gimp's UX sucks, they are really concious of not wanting to just be a photos

> I am fairly sure the UX is better than Gimp - the often criticised Gimp! Although Gimp's UX sucks, they are really concious of not wanting to just be a photoshop clone. Photopea's UX seems like it has been thought about even less, in that it is just an unashamed direct copy of photoshop (even down to the order of the tools in the left hand panel) I think its an interesting project, and certainly an achievement for a single person, but its not going to be 'the best photo editor in the world' if it is just trying to be photoshop.