2 ms·
Of course. My statement was predicated on the need for active network requests to obtain information. If the bot had passively listened to network traffic fro
by IncRnd 9y ago
Of course. My statement was predicated on the need for active network requests to obtain information. If the bot had passively listened to network traffic from LI, then I would argue for sameness with passively looking through a window.
- jimktrains2 9y agoWhat if it's dark and I shine a light on your ad in the window? (The issue at hand isn't DOS or resource-based, but permission.)
- IncRnd 9y agoI agree with your premise. I'm just reaching a different conclusion. As a permission issue, the bot _may_ have been authorized and authenticated, however the company was sent a C&D letter that revoked all authorizations. That is why I say that logging in and accessing the resources did not constitute authorizations. If a C&D letter would not have been sent, I think I'd agree with you.
- jimktrains2 9y agoYou can't prevent me from looking in your window though, at a sign you put up for people to look at none-the-less, with a C&D.
- IncRnd 9y agoAgreed. That's why I made my earlier comment, that this is closer to your entering a store (not just looking in the window) and examininb the merchandise after you already had been sent away for trespassing, revoking all authorization.