3 ms·
Did you read the linked article? The guy's business is in the tank. He wouldn't be hiring if the government paid him to hire. Which they might, actually, via
by jbooth 16y ago
Did you read the linked article? The guy's business is in the tank. He wouldn't be hiring if the government paid him to hire. Which they might, actually, via tax credits under certain circumstances, I'm not too up on that stuff.
The guy's numbers were ridiculous. The changes to his cash flow, year over year, regarding employees, are dominated by healthcare costs. That's not a government problem (although it arguably should be). To the extent that his cash flow is affected by taxes, Obama cut them.
No wonder he can't run a business.
- DanielBMarkham 16y agosigh
- jbooth 16y agoYou're saying that we should ignore his political affiliations and focus on the numbers he presented. I'm saying the numbers he presented don't add up to the point he was making unless you add them up totally wrong -- and the point he's making is manifestly political and has nothing to do with anyone's business reality.