4 ms·
Fair enough. I'd like to see that there is an effective communication going on between citizens and their representatives. Right now, with the current system,
by crankylinuxuser 9y ago
Fair enough.
I'd like to see that there is an effective communication going on between citizens and their representatives.
Right now, with the current system, I see a few ways to communicate.
Physical letter: form letter or nothing
Phone: automated system recording
Email: form letter or auto-subscribed to email list
Facebook: Ignored, form statement, or banned
Twitter: Ignored, form statement, or banned
What I do see that works is what lobbyists do: they have face-time with their legislators. The current contention rates of up to 500k people per representative makes that avenue nearly impossible currently. Unless you happen to get a glimpse at a talk, you have close to 0% chance of talking with your rep.
With a contention ratio of 30k to 50k/rep, would make meeting your representative much more likely. It would also reduce money effects, since now elections are a local thing instead of a moneyball contest.
- jdmichal 9y agoAs I said, that was definitely a devil's advocate position, and on this I very much agree with you in principle but not on approach. The approach I would rather see is to devolve power the federal government has managed to aggregate back down to the states, and hopefully even more local levels. I've commented on this before; I'll just link those instead of repeating myself: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11966167#11969956 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11966167#11969956 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12530363#12532344 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12530363#12532344