5 ms·
Wasn't HTML 5 supposed to be the last explicit version and then it would be a living standard without changing the version number?
by bringtheaction 9y ago
Wasn't HTML 5 supposed to be the last explicit version and then it would be a living standard without changing the version number?
- toxicFork 9y agoHTML 2018.1 disagrees
- currysausage 9y ago"HTML", not "HTML 5", yes: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/ https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/ The W3C regularly publishes forks [1] of the WHATWG HTML Living Standard. They have good SEO, but not much relevance. [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2014Apr/0034.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2014Apr/0034...
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- dragonwriter 9y agoNo, WHATWG dropped numbers in favor of the “living standard”, but W3C continued to issue numbered HTML version standards.