3 ms·
I think Kevin Drum meant the article wasn't worth much comment, but the fact that the WSJ chose to put it on the op-ed page was worth a few comments. Why did t
by jobu 16y ago
I think Kevin Drum meant the article wasn't worth much comment, but the fact that the WSJ chose to put it on the op-ed page was worth a few comments.
Why did the WSJ publish it? Perhaps it was a poor choice, perhaps it was a slow news day, or perhaps it was a double-cross to destroy Michael Fleischer's credibility with his own words.
- icarus_drowning 16y agoBut its the tone of that response that's the problem. Even if the fact that the WSJ chose to publish it is worthy of comment, its certainly worthy of more thoughtful comment. MJ looks as bad as the WSJ by responding to a clumsy op-ed with such a petty, ad-hom piece.