3 ms·
It would be nice if git kept both versions of the history around. One with work in progress commits, corrections from review, and merges. The other a clean reba
by orblivion 9y ago
It would be nice if git kept both versions of the history around. One with work in progress commits, corrections from review, and merges. The other a clean rebased history for usual history browsing.
- stinos 9y agoYou can do something like that easily by keeping multiple branches around. I do that sometimes when I'm doing some major rebase/cleanup of commits spanning more than a couple of days. Just so afterwards I can compare what I end up with with what I had originally.