3 ms·
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2ZHmCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq=a+priori+vs+axiomatic&source=bl&ots=1naGUKkfZt&sig=FL9TgKJ1_5FHcCpLa8Uhvlm6GqY&hl=en&sa=X&v
by memebox3v 9y ago
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2ZHmCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA23&lpg=PA23&dq=a+priori+vs+axiomatic&source=bl&ots=1naGUKkfZt&sig=FL9TgKJ1_5FHcCpLa8Uhvlm6GqY&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwis7Ijm3IjYAhXlLcAKHUveBTs4ChDoAQgbMAA#v=onepage&q=a%20priori%20vs%20axiomatic&f=false https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=2ZHmCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA23&lpg...
You have an argumentative style which implies that you are more interested in winning than seeking the truth. As such I am dissinclined to take you too seriously.
- Double_Cast 9y agoBecause this isn't about truth. This is about diction. You are using "a priori" in a non-standard way.
- Double_Cast 9y agoAlso. Maybe meditate on the irony of citing wikipedia articles without reading them and then criticizing polemics.