3 ms·
I don't think that [4] can really be accurately characterized as producing general-purpose journal management systems. The OSF is more for study management and
by neuromantik8086 9y ago
I don't think that [4] can really be accurately characterized as producing general-purpose journal management systems. The OSF is more for study management and sharing results, although I imagine that you're referring to OSF Preprints (https://osf.io/preprints https://osf.io/preprints) which serves a similar function for pre-peer review results sharing.
For [3], the actual platforms produced by Coko and its affiliates are more readily discovered here:
https://pubsweet.org/ https://pubsweet.org/
http://substance.io/ http://substance.io/
Hadn't heard of [2] before- looks neat.
We have [1] currently deployed for a couple of websites where I currently work. We've found it to be a bit of a pain and are trying to phase it out to some degree. It's basically a layer on top of WordPress to the best of my understanding (I haven't dealt too much with it).
- Vinnl 9y agoYou're completely correct, thanks for the updated links! Your final point is probably correct, but I'd add that when it comes to wanting to take publishing out of the hands of the established publishers, having to run software yourself is going to be painful anyway (though hopefully not as painful as OJS, which has quite a history already).