4 ms·
>Credit cards are super quick to use at the register. At least they used to be. Chips ruined that. Now I have to stand there staring at the screen for half a m
by jimmaswell 9y ago
>Credit cards are super quick to use at the register.
At least they used to be. Chips ruined that. Now I have to stand there staring at the screen for half a minute waiting to respond to prompts and to pull the card out at the end. For most transactions, cash is probably faster than using a chip.
- jarrettch 9y agoIt's even worse when your chip starts to fail, as one of my has started to do very recently. You have to put the card in three times(and wait for it to fail 3 times) before you're allowed to use the swipe function. Took longer than cash.
- jimmaswell 9y agoRecently I tried the chip and it failed, then I tried the swipe and it said to use the chip, then I used the chip and it said I had to use the swipe, and finally the swipe worked. First time I ever had a chip fail, and it's a pretty much brand new card, so it was most likely the machine's fault.
- jjuhl 9y agoI don't see the problem. If waiting a little is such a big deal then you are in too much of a hurry already and/or too stressed out. Relax. Take it easy.
- bbarn 9y agoWhere are you, out of curiousity? I find most of the chips are no slower than using a swipe card was before.
- jimmaswell 9y agoThe US
- btilly 9y agoI have the same experience in Orange County. Everyone hates the chip.
- Miredly 9y agoI lived in Spain for a year, and everyone had chips there. My US card always drew eyerolls as they had to find the /old/ machine and dust it off and find someone who remembered how to use it. I was excited that we were getting chips here in the US, but of course they fucked it up and for whatever reason it takes ages for your chip to be read, and there are frequent chip read errors.
- labster 9y agoChip cards work super-slow in the US. I often pay in cash because it's so much faster. I take the same chip card to the Netherlands and it works in a few seconds.
- chipotle_coyote 9y agoIn the US, it depends entirely on the point-of-sale system. Some are just as fast; some are a lot slower. My guess is that the slow ones are using the same old CPUs that the previous "stripe-only" ones did, which just aren't powerful enough to handle the added cryptography requirements in a reasonable amount of time.
- Oletros 9y agoI have been used cards with chips for years and now contactless payments and they are a lot quicker than swipping the card. In less than 5 seconds is done At least in Spain
- aidenn0 9y agoI assume spain is chip and pin? In the US it's chip and signature, and you can't sign until after the chip verification (either signing a paper receipt, or with a stylus on the terminal screen). In addition chips are new and some terminals are painfully slow (30 seconds) to verify. I'm not sure I've ever seen one finish in under 5 seconds, though a few merchants have terminals that come close to that.
- kmonsen 9y agoWhy can't you though? I feel that is an implementation detail that is leaking out. The machine can do two things at once and only use the signature if the transaction is successful.
- bobalob_wtf 9y agoChip & signature sounds awful (and pointless!) Why would they not use PIN? We now have contactless payments for under £30 in the UK, similar to Apple pay but you just place your card on the reader.
- WorldMaker 9y agoThe sad fact is the terminals are painfully slow because US banks don't think US customers want or are capable of using PINs. When you use a PIN you get a nice two factor signature from the card chip: it signs the current timestamp and the PIN you knew, and can do both as quickly as chip's processing capability and the bandwidth between the chip and terminal allows. US banks came up with a dumb compromise just like most of their websites use Wish-It-Were-Two-Factor auth and secondary "Security Question" passwords, the chip cards in the US are doing their own Wish-It-Were-Two-Factor: sign a timestamp, wait some amount of wall clock time, sign a different timestamp. Most of the wait in a chip purchase in the US is artificial just to make sure that two timestamps are "sufficiently" different. US banks should just give people PINs and stop this silliness.
- maroonblazer 9y agoThis used to be the case for me until very recently. I've noticed that the two grocery stores I frequent most are suddenly significantly faster. Like almost instant (less than 2 secs). This is in Seattle. So, it'll probably be that way everywhere eventually.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- russjr08 9y agoThis is why I’m a big fan of NFC payments when available. I find it to be pretty much instant, instead of having to wait what feels like 30 seconds for the chip transaction to process. Though I’m in the US. I hear chip transactions are way faster in other countries where they’ve been using that system for a while.
- Natanael_L 9y agoIn Sweden, in most stores, you insert the chip and enter the PIN just after the transaction starts, and then once everything is scanned you just confirm the total price (which is very quick).
- LeonidasXIV 9y agoIn Denmark you just use NFC/Contactless. Hardly anyone ever types in PIN numbers and it is also very quick. When I was visiting Sweden the terminals did not support NFC or I was just doing something wrong.
- Natanael_L 9y agoNFC support is getting more common in Sweden now. Retail stores has been slow with it until now, though.
- xfkechyk 9y agothat's because of shitty software. chip should get faster: https://paymentweek.com/2017-5-2-wait-no-more-quick-chip-technology-speeds-up-emv-transactions/ https://paymentweek.com/2017-5-2-wait-no-more-quick-chip-tec...