3 ms·
Your comment seems to be lashing out vs. actually addressing the parent comment. The user you are responding to already acknowledged the students are "addicted"
by molsongolden 9y ago
Your comment seems to be lashing out vs. actually addressing the parent comment. The user you are responding to already acknowledged the students are "addicted" to being social and using social media because that is the nature of being a teenager.
> "Of course, using phones in class is already against school policy, but it will remain and issue until I am able to take a phone away from a student. "
They also noted that using a phone in class is against policy but they have no way to enforce this policy... which is their reason for supporting a ban.
- andrewla 9y agonoobermin's comment makes sense and is reasonable when applied to germinalphrase's comment in light of the article itself, which includes in the ban the use of phones during breaks. germinalphrase's comment says "I would strongly favor a ban" and it is reasonable for noobermin to assume that they are referring to the ban in the article, since no exception was made in the original comment for this (although in an uncle post to this germinalphrase does clarify). I know it's bad form to object to people downvoting your own comment, so I will do it on the GP's behalf.