4 ms·

Thanks. I can see that this is a useful experiment, and I'm glad that the authors did it. It's just not clear to me that their model is new or needs a special n

by alew1 9y ago

Thanks. I can see that this is a useful experiment, and I'm glad that the authors did it. It's just not clear to me that their model is new or needs a special name; isn't this single-stream approach just the simplest interpretation of "using a WGAN to generate video" (just generate all the pixel data)? If anything, the two-stream architecture you link to seems like the special case/new idea.

firefred 9y ago
From my experience, I would say its the regular approach yes. But, since all pixels are generated and not copied from a static background image it is also much harder and probably unstable. Apparently it was not possible so far, otherwise, I cannot explain the gap in publications since the NIPS-2016 paper.