> T-Mobile's BingeOn is more of zero-rating than penalizing the speed/accessibility of non-approved "partners", Erm ... so, if users want to access non-approve

> T-Mobile's BingeOn is more of zero-rating than penalizing the speed/accessibility of non-approved "partners", Erm ... so, if users want to access non-approved "partners", that's way more expensive ... but that does not affect accessibility? If you really think that, you simply fell for their psychological trick. It's simply irrelevant whether the accessibility is limited technically or economically, as one is always convertible into the other (if they limited access technically, you could still restore access by offering them enough money).