3 ms·

Oops, I wanted to say "If you wish to try an early demo of stackvm in a few months, visit stackvm.com to sign up." :)

• luu 16y ago
  Oh well. I'm only griping because it looks really neat, and I want to try it out. How come you don't want people playing with the current stackvm? Is it because you're going to add a lot of features, and you expect people to be disappointed by the current feature set, because it's not currently stable, or because of something completely different?
  • pkrumins 16y ago
    It's because we don't have that much hardware. But you can try to get it running on your own. If you pull my current 'chat' stackvm branch [1], it's the one we used in the 2nd demo. You'd need qemu, node.js and a few node.js libraries. [1] http://github.com/pkrumins/stackvm/commit/162bca6eba35db815f270f4d7e136ae5f374422f http://github.com/pkrumins/stackvm/commit/162bca6eba35db815f...
    • luu 16y ago
      Very cool. Thanks!
  • substack 16y ago
    Not at all! The reason we haven't rolled out our demo yet is because hosting virtual machines takes a lot of server power to do. All of our code is up on github, so anybody can give it a spin for themselves, provided they can get it all running. http://github.com/substack/stackvm http://github.com/substack/stackvm http://github.com/pkrumins/stackvm http://github.com/pkrumins/stackvm