> Each sentence is its own tweet, and thus can be starred or retweeted on its own. Or misinterpreted on it's own. I have witnessed several cases in which a out

> Each sentence is its own tweet, and thus can be starred or retweeted on its own. Or misinterpreted on it's own. I have witnessed several cases in which a out-of-context sentence in such a tweetstorm lead to some shitstorm until the original author cleared it up. >People can reply to different parts of the tweetstorm, creating subthreads, allowing useful discussions to branch off of different parts of the tweetstorm. And it also leads to fragmentation where people begin to discuss subparts of the entire thread in separation and probably reurgitate the same topic twenty times in twenty different threads. >By forcing people through a clunky UX, you still force them to condense their ideas. Which IMO is bad since the condensed ideas I usually see on twitter lack substance (or even citations), people just throw out condensed stuff without context.