62 ms·
I proved to you that T-Mobile is violating net neutrality and you respond with "T-Mobile is not one of the companies that want to destroy net neutrality" You d
by jerkstate 9y ago
I proved to you that T-Mobile is violating net neutrality and you respond with "T-Mobile is not one of the companies that want to destroy net neutrality"
You don't seem to understand what net neutrality means, but you're not alone, it seems like few do.
- noncoml 9y agoI didn’t say you are wrong, you are absolutely right; binge on is violation of NN. I am just disagreeing on the timing; is it is a fight to fight another day, since T-Mobile is not actively pushing FCC to revoke NN.
- jerkstate 9y agoWhy would you recommend that people protest NN repeal by switching to a service provider that you claim is "pro net-neutrality" despite the fact that they built and delivered a product that is in violation of NN? My theory is that your understanding of what NN means doesn't line up with what the law says.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- noncoml 9y agoNot everything is black and white. You have a service provider A that is actively trying to repeal NN. You have a service provider B that is not trying to repeal NN, but as you "proved" violated "net-neutrality". Switching to SP B, it shows that you don't want NN repealed.