3 ms·
Fish is nice and I eventually learned to accept the scripting. BUT if it is the shell for the ‘90s what is the 21st century shell?
by charlescearl 9y ago
Fish is nice and I eventually learned to accept the scripting. BUT if it is the shell for the ‘90s what is the 21st century shell?
- pzone 9y agoIt's a joke. The implication is that Bash was already outdated in the 90s, so it's long past time for something new.
- charlescearl 9y agoI know, just trying to be too pithy :) But will seriously look at some of the other shells mentioned. I miss scsh.
- interfixus 9y agoFish with a plugin for ironic comprehension.
- megaman22 9y agoGah, probably node...
- Groxx 9y agoTermKit possibly fits this: https://acko.net/blog/on-termkit/ https://acko.net/blog/on-termkit/ I'm not so sold on some of the tokenizing / etc styling, but `cat image.jpg` -> see an image? yes please. Alternatively, I keep checking in on Xiki periodically, since it has some extremely interesting features: http://xiki.org/ http://xiki.org/
- thanatos_dem 9y agoUnfortunately TermKit is effectively dead, with the last commit being almost 6 years ago - https://github.com/unconed/TermKit https://github.com/unconed/TermKit
- Rebelgecko 9y agoiTerm has an imgcat command, which is occasionally handy (works independent of your shell)
- itu 9y agoUpterm [1] claims to be "A terminal emulator for the 21st century." [1] https://github.com/railsware/upterm https://github.com/railsware/upterm
- chubot 9y agoI made a comprehensive list of shells here: https://github.com/oilshell/oil/wiki/ExternalResources https://github.com/oilshell/oil/wiki/ExternalResources Of course I think my own project, Oil, could be a "21st century shell", or I wouldn't be working on it :) It's designed in a principled way, and it's also the only one that's compatible with bash.