It's an annoying philosophical problem. Mainly it's concerned with a long-running debate of how one should define "omnipotent" for the Philosopher's God. Consid

It's an annoying philosophical problem. Mainly it's concerned with a long-running debate of how one should define "omnipotent" for the Philosopher's God. Consider the problem, "Can God make a block so heavy even he cannot move it?" Disregarding the problems with physics here, most philosophers agree that omnipotence should be complete power over all things which are logically possible. Whatever system such a God creates, things will operate consistently within that system. Of course, altering the system is fine, but then "logic" would still continue to be consistent in the new system.