Correct me if I am wrong wouldn't this position Cloudflare as a "Publisher" of the content? Forget about holding it liable for censoring content(email via dmarc

Correct me if I am wrong wouldn't this position Cloudflare as a "Publisher" of the content? Forget about holding it liable for censoring content(email via dmarc p=reject;),but as a publisher is it not liable for the nature of the content it publishes? I understand that you can't hold Cloudflare liable just because it's customers hosted illegal or damaging content. But isn't a "publisher" liable for content take-down after an abuse notice? If they can't be sued under civil law,can't they be prosecuted under criminal law? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aiding_and_abetting https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aiding_and_abetting Section two title 18: > (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.