3 ms·
That article doesn't help anything. That is still a pure FUD based article. It offers no info and just speculates that without regulation, ISPs will just charge
by esaym 9y ago
That article doesn't help anything. That is still a pure FUD based article. It offers no info and just speculates that without regulation, ISPs will just charge you more and have "fast lanes" and packaged plans.... I'm so sick of that argument. We've never seen anything like that in America before NN. Its a pure strawman argument.
- cracell 9y agoI think you are just trolling but for others reading this here's a list of bad things that were net neutrality violations: https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-violations-brief-history https://www.freepress.net/blog/2017/04/25/net-neutrality-vio... There's also lots of examples from other countries that don't have net neutrality like Mexico https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/6x6izw/guys_m%C3%A9xico_has_no_net_neutrality_laws_this_is/ https://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/6x6izw/guys_m%C... (certain websites are not available on the lower tiered plans)
- esaym 9y agoI am not trolling and yes I've already read those articles. That is exactly what I am complaining about. There is no evidence that these strawman arguments will come to pass. And even though "bad" things happened without NN, they were ultimately resolved (without NN)
- dhimes 9y agoYou are totally trolling. Yeah, nobody can guarantee that these things won’t happen. But they’ll be enabled. It will increase profits. So it will likely happen. But you know that.